{"id":536,"date":"2024-05-31T10:03:53","date_gmt":"2024-05-31T10:03:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/?p=536"},"modified":"2024-05-31T10:03:53","modified_gmt":"2024-05-31T10:03:53","slug":"upc-court-of-appeal-appoints-pinsent-masons-partner-as-judge-starting-september-will-leave-his-firm-and-replace-judge-francoise-barutel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/upc-court-of-appeal-appoints-pinsent-masons-partner-as-judge-starting-september-will-leave-his-firm-and-replace-judge-francoise-barutel\/","title":{"rendered":"UPC Court of Appeal appoints Pinsent Masons partner as judge starting September, will leave his firm and replace Judge Fran\u00e7oise Barutel"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-global-padding is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\" style=\"border-width:1px\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Context:<\/strong> Patent judges in different parts of Europe were and remain interested in serving on the Unified Patent Court (UPC). They are even prepared to commute by plane, which <strong>ip fray<\/strong> believes the UPC should avoid as far as possible in light of climate change policies (<a href=\"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/new-unified-patent-court-appointments-even-more-judges-will-have-to-commute-by-plane-oblivious-to-climate-change\/\">May 28, 2024 <strong>ip fray<\/strong> article<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What&#8217;s new:<\/strong> Surprisingly, Judge Fran\u00e7oise Barutel is retiring from the UPC&#8217;s Court of Appeal as of September 8, 2024 for unspecified personal reasons. The UPC made <a href=\"https:\/\/unified-patent-court.org\/en\/news\/upcoming-change-judicial-composition-court-appeal\">the official announcement<\/a> yesterday (a public holiday in many of its contracting states). On September 9, 2024, Emmanuel Goug\u00e9 will take her seat. In the meantime, he will retire from Pinsent Masons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Direct impact:<\/strong> Mr. Goug\u00e9 has bar admissions both in France and the UK, which means that he will be in a particularly strong position to hear and decide English-language appeals, of which there will be plenty. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Wider ramifications:<\/strong> A sample of one does not make a statistic. There could be any number of reasons for Judge Barutel&#8217;s personal decision, so for the time being there is no reason to suspect, much less assume, that the UPC has internal problems. The appointment of a patent litigator from private practice is surprising and <strong><em>may be internally controversial<\/em><\/strong>, even more so when considering that he goes straight to the Court of Appeal as opposed to first serving on the Court of First Instance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pinsent Masons will presumably deactivate <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/people\/emmanuel-gouge\">Mr. Goug\u00e9&#8217;s attorney profile<\/a> in September. For future reference, this is how his professional focus is presently described:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Emmanuel Goug\u00e9 is a renowned counsel and litigator in IP law, with a strong focus on patents, trade secrets and trademarks. Emmanuel has been involved in a range of multi-jurisdictional IP matters. His practice focuses mainly on electronics, automotive, aerospace, life sciences, and medical devices. Emmanuel has been involved in a wide range of cross-border litigations and has played an instrumental role in advising clients on multi-jurisdictional matters.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He&#8217;s been with Pinsent Masons since 2011. In 1994, he was admitted to the Paris Bar, and in 1998, he became a solicitor in England and Wales. He&#8217;s presently heading Pinsent Masons&#8217;s French IP practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 1991, he participated in a joint French-German Master of German and Business Law program by Panth\u00e9on-Assas University \u2013 Paris II and Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich. That, too, is noteworthy with a view to the UPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It could be that Mr. Goug\u00e9 has reached a point in his career where the difference in income between private practice and a judgeship on the UPC&#8217;s court of Appeal is not much of a consideration, and he opted for an interesting new position. In the U.S. and the UK, unlike such countries as Germany, judges are typically recruited from lawyers in private practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A revolving door between the bench and the private sector would raise issues. But there is no particular reason to assume that Mr. Goug\u00e9 would return to Pinsent Masons after a few years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is, however, possible that certain judges on the UPC&#8217;s Court of First Instance (Central and Local Divisions) feel they should have been promoted instead of appointing a patent litigator from private practice straight to the Court of Appeal. For political reasons, the choice would probably have been limited to French candidates anyway.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Judge Fran\u00e7oise Barutel retires from the UPC&#8217;s Court of Appeal for unspecified personal reasons. Her successor will be Emmanuel Goug\u00e9, who will leave Pinsent Masons for his judgeship.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-patent-litigation","category-unified-patent-court"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=536"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":537,"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536\/revisions\/537"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipfray.com\/staging1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}