-
Austrian patent attorney firm litigates UPC infringement cases as lead counsel, not requiring attorneys-at-law
Read more: Austrian patent attorney firm litigates UPC infringement cases as lead counsel, not requiring attorneys-at-lawAn Austrian patent attorney firm is increasingly representing clients as lead counsel in infringement (not merely revocation) actions before the Unified Patent Court.
-
EU Commission paper contemplates lower standard-essential patent royalties for cleantech, royalty-free green standards
Read more: EU Commission paper contemplates lower standard-essential patent royalties for cleantech, royalty-free green standardsThe European Commission published a paper on Friday that is meant to reflect a thorough and responsible approach to policy-making, but ends up revealing an interventionist long-term agenda.
-
Judicial economy matters: after Federal Circuit order in Google case, Judge Albright denies Microsoft’s transfer motion
Read more: Judicial economy matters: after Federal Circuit order in Google case, Judge Albright denies Microsoft’s transfer motionAfter the Federal Circuit affirmed his denial of a venue transfer motion by Google in case brought by the same plaintiff (Proxense), Judge Albright has now denied a Microsoft motion.
-
GlaxoSmithKline sues Pfizer, BioNTech in District of Delaware over mRNA patents allegedly infringed by COVID vaccine
Read more: GlaxoSmithKline sues Pfizer, BioNTech in District of Delaware over mRNA patents allegedly infringed by COVID vaccineGlaxoSmithKline, one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, is suing Pfizer and BioNTech in the District of Delaware, alleging that their COVID-19 vaccines infringe GSK’s mRNA patents.
-
UPC Court of Appeal clarifies deadline for PI appeals, exercises discretion in appellant’s favor but may not do so next time
Read more: UPC Court of Appeal clarifies deadline for PI appeals, exercises discretion in appellant’s favor but may not do so next timeThe deadline for an appeal of a preliminary injunction or denial thereof by the court of first instance of the UPC is 15 days, while it is two months for final decisions in main proceedings. The UPC Court of Appeal apparently expects practitioners to be aware of this going forward, period.
-
OPPO releases white paper on IP touting innovative strength (among top 10 PCT patent filers), advocates balanced policy
Read more: OPPO releases white paper on IP touting innovative strength (among top 10 PCT patent filers), advocates balanced policyChinese smartphone maker OPPO released an IP white paper on World Intellectual Property Day highlighting the company’s innovative capacity and promoting balanced IP policies.
-
Unprecedented patent claim limitation has UPC perplexed in new judiciary’s first-ever full patent infringement trial
Read more: Unprecedented patent claim limitation has UPC perplexed in new judiciary’s first-ever full patent infringement trialFew judges have heard as many patent infringement actions as Judge Dr. Matthias Zigann, but in the first full UPC infringement trial in history, he encounered a puzzling claim limitation of a kind that even he had not seen before.
-
Patent licensing firm’s lawsuits against Apple, Google in UPC, Munich make strange bedfellows among outside counsel
Read more: Patent licensing firm’s lawsuits against Apple, Google in UPC, Munich make strange bedfellows among outside counselThe fiercest rivalry in German patent litigation history results in an apparently unprecedented joint defense alliance.
Follow Us
Latest Articles
- Austrian patent attorney firm litigates UPC infringement cases as lead counsel, not requiring attorneys-at-law
- EU Commission paper contemplates lower standard-essential patent royalties for cleantech, royalty-free green standards
- Judicial economy matters: after Federal Circuit order in Google case, Judge Albright denies Microsoft’s transfer motion
- GlaxoSmithKline sues Pfizer, BioNTech in District of Delaware over mRNA patents allegedly infringed by COVID vaccine
- UPC Court of Appeal clarifies deadline for PI appeals, exercises discretion in appellant’s favor but may not do so next time