BREAKING: Ericsson, Transsion settle global patent litigation

Context: In November 2025, Ericsson launched a global enforcement campaign against China’s Transsion, the world’s fourth-largest smartphone maker, over 4G and 5G-related standard-essential patents (SEPs). It sued the Chinese supplier in Brazil, India, Nigeria, and three venues in the UPC (November 14, 2025 ip fray article), as well as Indonesia, Colombia, and Morocco (December 19, 2025 ip fray article), before adding more actions in Vietnam, Thailand, the Philippines, South Africa, and another in Brazil (January 30, 2026 ip fray article). In May, Transsion clamped back by filing its first-ever public patent infringement action against Ericsson before the UPC (March 26, 2026 ip fray article), as well as several invalidation challenges with the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Yesterday, Moroccan media outlet Médias24 reported (in French) that the Casablanca Trade Court enjoined Transsion subsidiaries Tecno Mobile Limited and Itel Mobility Limited from selling 4G and 5G smartphones in the North African country due to a violation of some Ericsson patents (July 8, 2026 ip fray article). 

What’s new: Ericsson and global Chinese smartphone maker Transsion have reached a settlement resolving their dispute over a multi-year, global patent cross-license agreement, the companies have just announced (July 8, 2026 Ericsson press release).

Direct impact: The settlement means that all pending cases between the companies, across all jurisdictions, will be withdrawn. Ericsson noted that the financial benefit from this cross-licensing deal is expected to be reflected in its Q3 2026 report. It emphasized that “opportunities remain to further grow IPR revenues”.

Wider ramifications:

  • This comes shortly after Ericsson also announced it has settled its dispute with Verifone (July 7, 2026 Roy Maharaj LinkedIn post). The SEP owner had sued Verifone in both the UPC’s Mannheim Local Division (LD) and the Hague LD, asserting a cellular SEP and additionally asking the court for a declaration of FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing) compliance (February 20, 2026 ip fray article). This quick succession of agreements is certainly a boost to the company’s litigation efforts, as it also continues to litigate against ASUS in the UPC’s Milan LD (June 17, 2026 ip fray article), as well as the Lisbon LD, and the Munich I Regional Court.
  • This is also positive for Transsion, notably because it is a cross-licensing deal – not one-way – meaning the company’s pressure in China and in the UPC may have held some sway. While Transsion has been able to settle many of its disputes with major Western SEP owners, including the likes of Qualcomm and Philips, this is the first publicly known cross-licensing deal of its kind.

In a statement to ip fray today, the company noted that it has long been a “leading contributor to 3GPP and to the development of global mobile standards for the benefit of consumers and enterprises everywhere”. It added:

“The value of Ericsson’s patent portfolio of more than 60,000 granted patents is strengthened by our leading position as a 5G vendor and annual investments of around $5 billion in R&D.”

Transsion’s string of settlements

Transsion has had some success in its litigation, settling with Qualcomm (January 16, 2025 ip fray article) and Philips (July 16, 2025 ip fray article), and Access Advance licensors NEC, JVC, Sun Patent Trust (July 17, 2025 ip fray article), Huawei (August 4, 2025 ip fray article), and Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) (August 18, 2025 ip fray article) through an HEVC license last year (December 1, 2025 ip fray article). It also signed a patent license agreement with Nokia last January, without litigation (January 30, 2025 ip fray article).

However, the company continues to fend off SEP assertions by InterDigital (July 3, 2026 ip fray article) and LG Electronics (January 20, 2026 ip fray article).

Court and counsel

Below is a table of all the courts in which Ericsson had sued Transsion, and the firms representing the patentee:

Date of filingJurisdictionCourtRepresentative
November 2025BrazilThe 1st Business Court of Rio de Janeiro State CourtLicks Attorneys
November 2025IndiaDelhi High CourtSingh & Singh
November 2025NigeriaFederal High Court of Nigeria, Lagos Judicial DivisionJackson, Etti, & Edu
November 2025UPCThe Hague LDTaylor Wessing
November 2025UPCMannheim LDKather Augenstein
November 2025UPCParis Central Division (CD))Taylor Wessing
December 2025IndonesiaJudicial Delegature of the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC); Civil Circuit Courts of BogotaOlarteMoure
December 2025ColombiaThe Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District CourtRouse
December 2025MoroccoThe Tribunal of Commerce of First Instance in Casablanca.SabaIP
January 2026BrazilBusiness Court of the Rio de Janeiro State CourtLicks Attorneys
January 2026The PhilippinesBureau of Legal Affairs of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines in Taguig CityRouse
January 2026South AfricaCourt of the Commissioner of Patents in PretoriaSmit & Van Wyk and Taylor Wessing
January 2026ThailandCentral Intellectual Property and International Trade Court (the IP & IT Court) in BangkokTilleke & Gibbins
January 2026VietnamRegional People’s Court No. 1 in Ho Chi Minh City and Regional People’s Court No. 2 in HanoiRouse

In the UPC, Transsion was being represented by Powell Gilbert’s Andreas Kramer.