UK court pivots from contract to competition law in decision claiming jurisdiction over Amazon’s FRAND action against InterDigital

Context: The FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing; or just RAND in this case, the omission of the F having no effect) dispute between Amazon and InterDigital over video patents has let to major cross-jurisdictional entanglements:

  • The UK antisuit injunction (ASI), styled as an anti-antisuit injunction (AASI), in Amazon’s favor was affirmed after a hearing (December 11, 2025 ip fray article).
  • So were the Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) (December 25, 2025 ip fray article) and Munich I Regional Court’s (December 1, 2025 ip fray article) anti-interim-license injunctions (AILIs), which must be interpreted as general anti-antisuit injunctions against foreign interference with property rights.
  • Last month, Mr Justice Richard Meade of the High Court of Justice for England & Wales (EWHC) expressed a great deal of skepticism when hearing InterDigital’s jurisdictional challenge (with fallback positions involving forum non conveniens and a case management stay) to Amazon’s UK case (December 4, 2025 ip fray article).

To Read The Full Story

Continue reading your article with a Membership

Court and counsel

The decision was made by Mr Justice Richard Meade.

Counsel for Amazon: Andrew Lykardiopoulos KC and Ligia Osepciu, instructed by Hogan Lovells.

Counsel for Bird & Bird: Michael Bloch KC and Thomas Jones, instructed by Bird & Bird.