Category: Unified Patent Court
-
First-ever UPC Mannheim anti-antisuit injunction, U.S. court denies PI against Brazilian SEP enforcement: InterDigital v. Disney
This may even be the first anti-antisuit injunction ever to have been granted by a court based in the city of Mannheim, Germany.
-
Second UPC lawsuit filed against BYD: will Tesla throw its Chinese competitors under the bus or vice versa?
BYD is coming under ever more pressure from standard-essential patent assertions. Another case has been filed with the UPC’s The Hague Local Division.
-
EXCLUSIVE: SEP enforcement against Chinese car maker BYD reaches Unified Patent Court’s The Hague Local Division
After two SEP enforcement lawsuits against Chinese automaker BYD in Munich, Sol IP added one in Mannheim and is now suing in the UPC’s The Hague Local Division, too.
-
UPC Roundup (1 week): concept of anchor defendant recognized; juicer patent invalidated; other decisions and various new cases
This is a summary of developments in and around the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in the week since our May 17, 2025 UPC Roundup. 1. The Hague LD: Anchor defendant may expose foreign legal entities to liability due to BSH long-arm jurisdiction (Genevant & Arbutus v. Moderna) (link to LinkedIn post) This UPC action is part…
-
HMD faces new UPC complaints brought by Orange and Navigate (the latter over a Dolby patent)
Context: HMD’s most well-known standard-essential patent (SEP) dispute at the moment is with VoiceAge EVS (May 5, 2025 ip fray article). HMD also has yet to settle a licensing dispute with Huawei. And two months ago we reported on an Indian court hearing where it turned out that HMD initially offered, for the purposes of…
-
UPC Court of Appeal makes UK judge feel even better about his decision: Alexion v. Amgen & Samsung Bioepis
Mr Justice Meade of the High Court of Justice for England & Wales would have reached the same decision anyway, but likes the fact that the UPC CoA interpreted the claim language in the same way.
-
UPC Roundup (1 week): second medical use; evidence gathering through on-site experiments; various new cases
This is a summary of developments in and around the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in the week since our May 10, 2025 UPC Roundup. Only a few noteworthy things happened. 1. CoA: confidentiality concerns don’t warrant splitting up case In Corning v. Hisense, TCL and LG, Standing Judge (of the Court of Appeal (CoA)) Patricia Rombach affirmed…
-
UPC Dusseldorf issues first decision on second medical use, hands win to Amgen in cholesterol patent dispute against Sanofi
The Dusseldorf Local Division has clarified how the UPC deals with second medical use in patent infringement proceedings, including considering the extent or significance of the allegedly infringing use, and whether an entity is “positively” or “negatively” influencing a market by encouraging infringement, or preventing a product from being used for patented use.
-
UPC Roundup (1 week): one permanent injunction granted, one preliminary injunction denied
This is a summary of developments in and around the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in the week since our May 4, 2025 UPC Roundup. Only a few noteworthy things happened. 1. Permanent injunction in Grundfos v. Canned Motor Pump; licensing talks don’t matter, lack of inventive step must be pleaded early: Dusseldorf LD (link to detailed article)…
-
New UPC Dusseldorf injunction clarifies irrelevance of licensing talks to proportionality, stresses need to argue obviousness early
In a case involving circulation pumps for heating systems and other use cases, the UPC’s Dusseldorf LD has provided some clarifications of relevance to many other cases.