Magistrate judge recommends Amazon lose standing fight against Edge Networking despite Cisco, Intel inventor agreements

Context: Cisco’s Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for IP Litigation, Bryan Sinclair, testified at a July 21, 2026 evidentiary hearing in this case about Cisco’s employee invention-assignment practices testimony. ip fray reported on this as part of a separate Proxense v. Cisco Wi-Fi patent suit (July 24, 2026 ip fray article). In November 2024, Edge Networking Systems LLC sued Amazon for allegedly infringing seven of its patents in the United States District for the Eastern District of Texas. Amazon moved for summary judgment, arguing Edge lacked standing because the underlying inventions actually belonged to Cisco and Intel, the former employers of the two named inventors.

To Read The Full Story

Continue reading your article with a Membership

Counsel

Edge Networking Systems LLC is being represented by Fabricant, Rubino & Lambrianakos LLP’s Alfred Ross Fabricant, Peter Lambrianakos, Vincent J. Rubino III, Joseph Michael Mercadante, Ryan F. Oliver, Jacob Daniel Ostling and Julian Glenn Pymento; Hecht Partners LLP’s David L. Hecht; McKool Smith P.C.’s Jennifer Leigh Truelove; and Truelove Law Firm’s Justin Kurt Truelove.

Amazon is being represented by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP’s Srinivas Giriraj Pathmanaban, Clement Naples, Joseph C. Akalski, Kristina R. Cary, Lucas Lonergan, Miranda Herzog, and Socrates Boutsikaris; Potter Minton’s Michael E. Jones and Shaun William Hassett; and The Dacus Firm, PC’s Deron R. Dacus.