U.S. Supreme Court again called upon to examine “settled expectations” basis for USPTO discretionary denials

Context: Kahoot, a Norwegian online education platform, petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for inter partes review (IPR) of an Interstellar, Inc. patent. In July 2025 Coke Morgan Stewart, then Acting Director of the USPTO, discretionarily denied Kahoot’s petition, primarily on the basis of Interstellar’s “settled expectations” as to the patent’s validity. Kahoot’s subsequent petition for writ of mandamus was denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

To Read The Full Story

Continue reading your article with a Membership

Counsel

Kahoot is represented by Paul Hastings’ Rudolph Y. Kim, Igor V. Timofeyev, Naveen Modi, Chetan Bansal, and Maksim Mints.

  1. 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) states: “The determination by the Director whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable.” ↩︎