UPC’s CD Milan rejects piecemeal claim narrowing even when there may be plenty of time for revocation claimant and court to digest

Most of our articles start with a box that explains the context and the further implications, but sometimes (such as in this case) we publish very short pieces just to draw practitioners’ attention to developments worth taking note of that don’t require an elaborate structure.

To Read The Full Story

Continue reading your article with a Membership

Court and counsel

Panel: Presiding Judge Andrea Postiglione, Judge-rapporteur Anna-Lena Klein, and Technically Qualified Judge Kerstin Roselinger.

Counsel for the revocation claimant (whose objection was sustained): WBH Wachenhausen patent attorneys Thorsten Haslinde (the H in WBH), Marc Wachenhausen (the W in WBH), and Vladimir Traykov; with support from Arnold Ruess (ip fray firm profile) attorneys-at-law Dr. Arno Risse (“Riße” in German) and Dr. Felix Beck.

Counsel for the patentee: Mewburn Ellis patent attorneys Matthew Naylor and Isobel Stone.