-
Here’s how law firms and litigants can keep ip fray informed of their UPC and other patent cases and achievements
Read more: Here’s how law firms and litigants can keep ip fray informed of their UPC and other patent cases and achievementsHere’s how law firms and litigants can keep ip fray informed of Unified Patent Court and other proceedings, such as on the names of the attorneys involved.
-
UPC Paris CD: amended claims proposed as part of statement of defense to revocation claim accepted despite workflow violation (for now)
Read more: UPC Paris CD: amended claims proposed as part of statement of defense to revocation claim accepted despite workflow violation (for now)The UPC’s Paris CD maintains, for now, a permissive standard for workflow violations. In this case, amended claims were proposed along with the statement of defense to a revocation claim.
-
UPC’s Paris CD: disloyalty of counsel is not the other party’s business, and court provides guidance on sufficiently concrete claims
Read more: UPC’s Paris CD: disloyalty of counsel is not the other party’s business, and court provides guidance on sufficiently concrete claimsThe Unified Patent Court’s Paris Central Division has clarified that (a) an adversary has no standing to allege disloyal conduct by someone’s counsel and (b) gives guidance on what makes an injunction request and a damages claim sufficiently concrete.
-
$847 million patent verdict against Verizon; Ericsson on extended receiving end of $583M part, fighting patent at PTAB jointly with Nokia
Read more: $847 million patent verdict against Verizon; Ericsson on extended receiving end of $583M part, fighting patent at PTAB jointly with NokiaContext: Hardly a month passes without a non-practicing entity (NPE) obtaining a patent damages verdict in the hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. district court (May 11, 2024 ip fray article). What’s new: On Friday (June 28, 2024), a jury in the Eastern District of Texas awarded NPE General Access Solutions $847 million over…
-
Supreme Court casts USPTO into greatest legal uncertainty in its (at least modern) history: Loper Bright v. Raimondo
Read more: Supreme Court casts USPTO into greatest legal uncertainty in its (at least modern) history: Loper Bright v. RaimondoThe Supreme Court has overruled a decades-old doctrine that entitled government agencies such as the USPTO to deference on legal questions concerning their governing statutes.
-
Samsung began Galaxy Ring mass production on June 6, will launch in U.S. in early August: court filing
Read more: Samsung began Galaxy Ring mass production on June 6, will launch in U.S. in early August: court filingSamsung’s latest court filing in a dispute with smart-ring maker Oura states the exact date on which Samsung began manufacturing the Galaxy Ring and indicates a U.S. launch in early August.
-
UPC Hamburg LD deems three-month delay too much for preliminary injunction request: Ballinno v. Kinexion & UEFA
Read more: UPC Hamburg LD deems three-month delay too much for preliminary injunction request: Ballinno v. Kinexion & UEFABased on current case law, Preliminary injunction requests in the Unified Patent Court’s German Local Divisions should be brought as soon as possible, and not more than two months after identifying an infringement.
Follow Us
Latest Articles
- UPC panels still disagree on whether claim amendments are admissible in PI proceedings: Milan LD throws out auxiliary requests, unconditional amendment
- Panasonic-OPPO settlement NOT FINALIZED: new UPC order shows Panasonic wanted FRAND injunction though OPPO sought stay
- UPC’s Hague LD finds plant-based microbial fuel cell patent infringed not literally, but by equivalence
- Despite settlement, Mannheim LD grants first-ever UPC FRAND injunction in Panasonic v. OPPO, disagrees with European Commission
- First Adeia v. Disney UPC case has become discoverable: U.S. licensing firm went to The Hague