Category: Antisuit Injunctions
-
Lenovo’s antisuit motion against Ericsson fails as court adopts Judge Gilstrap’s Ericsson v. Apple logic
Judge Terrence Boyle of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina has denied Lenovo’s antisuit motion as the U.S. case won’t force either party into a license agreement, thus isn’t dispositive of foreign infringement actions.
-
Lenovo files with UPC, seeks UK preliminary injunction to stop Ericsson’s ongoing SEP enforcement in Latin America
Lenovo has informed a U.S. court (which still hasn’t decided on its motion for an antisuit injunction) of new filings with the UPC and a preliminary injunction request in the UK.
-
No anti-antisuit injunction for Ericsson against Lenovo in Colombia while U.S. court is weighing antisuit motion
Lenovo, in an attempt to remind the court of the pendency of the TRO motion, argued Ericsson was making a renewed push for a Colombian anti-antisuit injunction. But Ericsson merely appealed in a case it lost on the technical merits.
-
$5.22 per unit is aggregate 5G SEP royalty according to Lenovo’s deductions from UK High Court decisions
Lenovo points to the FRAND determinations from London in its own dispute with InterDigital and in Optis v. Apple, arguing that the total 5G stack value is $5.22/unit and Ericsson should therefore get only 23 cents.
-
Lenovo offered Ericsson only 23 cents per phone, is seeking its own SEP injunctions; U.S. antisuit hearing on 1/11
Ericsson’s opposition to Lenovo’s U.S. antisuit TRO motion contains various interesting revelations concerning Lenovo’s tactics.
-
Lenovo seeks antisuit injunction, says Ericsson brought 30+ preliminary injunction actions in Colombia
Lenovo filed a U.S. antisuit motion on Friday against Ericsson’s injunctions in Brazil and Colombia. More than 30 PI motions filed in Colombia.